How to Stop Cattle Selective Feeding with a Forage Grinder

Why Cattle Sort Their Feed — and Why It Costs You Money

Selective feeding is one of the most underestimated sources of economic loss on Australian feedlots and dairy operations. It occurs when cattle consume the grain and leaf fractions of a ration while leaving behind the straw, stover, and long-fibre components. The result looks harmless — the feedbunk empties — but the animals that eat first are over-consuming starch and under-consuming fibre, while animals that eat later receive an inverted ration that is mostly roughage with the energy fraction already gone. Neither group is being fed what the ration was formulated to deliver, and the production consequences are measurable: reduced average daily gain, variable milk yields, inconsistent body condition scores, and a higher incidence of digestive health problems including sub-acute ruminal acidosis and displaced abomasum.

Cattle are physically capable of sorting because their tongues are prehensile — they can grip and selectively ingest particles above roughly 20 mm in length. They choose long particles (long hay, straw stalks) when fibre appetite drives them, and they select grain and leaf when energy drives them. A ration with mixed particle sizes gives them the physical opportunity to express this preference. The solution is not to change the ration formulation — it is to eliminate the physical opportunity for sorting by reducing all ration components to a particle size narrow enough that selection is mechanically impractical. A hammer-mill forage grinder, used correctly and maintained properly, is the most reliable way to achieve this.

Round baler producing uniform forage bales for consistent feed

Consistent bale quality — uniform density and moisture — feeds into consistent grinder output, which in turn produces a TMR that cattle cannot effectively sort.

The Particle Size Threshold That Stops Sorting

Research into cattle sorting behaviour consistently identifies a threshold around 19–25 mm: particles above this length can be reliably selected by cattle; particles below it are increasingly difficult to sort. A commonly used benchmark in feedlot nutrition is that less than 8% of a ration’s dry matter should be retained on a 19 mm sieve. When this benchmark is met, cattle sorting indices — measured by comparing fresh ration composition with refusal composition after 24 hours — approach 1.0, meaning the animal consumed the ration in the same proportions it was offered.

Achieving less than 8% retention on the 19 mm sieve with a hammer-mill forage grinder requires the right screen size and well-maintained hammers. The 9F-70 fitted with an 8 mm screen produces a particle distribution where the 19 mm retention is typically 2–5% for dry hay and 4–8% for straw and corn stover. These figures sit within the anti-sorting benchmark. A 10 mm screen increases 19 mm retention to 8–14% for stover — above the benchmark — and is better suited to dry cow rations where some sorting is acceptable. The 6 mm screen produces 19 mm retention below 2% for all common roughage types, effectively eliminating sorting potential at the cost of some rumen mat formation capacity in high-grain rations.

How Grinding Changes Feedbunk Behaviour

Operations that transition from unground or coarsely chopped roughage to hammer-mill ground material in their TMR typically observe three behavioural changes at the feedbunk within the first 7–14 days. First, individual animal intake becomes more uniform — the coefficient of variation in dry matter intake across the pen drops, which is visible in more consistent body condition scores within a mob. Second, feedbunk refusal composition changes: instead of a straw-heavy residue with grain and leaf consumed, refusals consist of a representative sample of the whole ration, indicating that selective consumption has ceased. Third, total refusal volume often decreases by 5–10% as animals stop avoiding the fibre fraction they previously sorted around.

These behavioural changes translate into measurable production outcomes. Feedlot operations have reported 3–6% improvements in average daily gain in the 30 days following conversion to ground-roughage TMR, attributable to more consistent energy intake across the pen. Dairy operations have reported reductions in milk fat depression frequency — a common marker of SARA — after switching from long hay to hammer-mill ground hay in the TMR roughage fraction. The financial value of these improvements is site-specific but consistently exceeds the operating cost of the grinder on operations above 50–80 head.

Hay baler conveyor for efficient forage handling

Efficient forage handling from paddock to feedbunk — baling, conveying, and grinding — keeps the feed chain consistent and reduces the variables that cause sorting problems.

Step-by-Step: Setting Up the 9F-70 to Prevent Sorting

1

Select the correct screen for your animal class

Start with an 8 mm screen for beef finishing and dairy TMR roughage. This delivers a particle distribution that meets the anti-sorting benchmark for most hay and straw types. If the Penn State sieve test shows more than 8% on the 19 mm sieve, drop to a 6 mm screen. If rumination time drops and SARA signs appear, move back to 8 mm and address sorting through TMR mixer sequence rather than finer grinding.

2

Maintain hammer condition within the rated service interval

Worn hammers produce a wider particle size distribution with more coarse outliers above 25 mm — exactly the particles that enable sorting. Flip hammers at 100 operating hours and replace at 200 hours for dry hay conditions. Do not wait until throughput drops visibly; by that point the particle distribution has already widened and the ration has been affected for days or weeks.

3

Check screen integrity after any stone or metal impact

A single stone impact can distort a screen section, creating oversized holes that allow unground particles to pass. Inspect the screen face visually after any unusual sound from the grinding chamber, and replace if deformation or cracked holes are found near the impact point.

4

Run the Penn State sieve test weekly during feeding seasons

Weighing 200 g of freshly ground material through the 19 mm, 8 mm, and 1.18 mm sieves takes 5 minutes and immediately reveals whether the grinder is producing within target specification. Make this a weekly routine so any drift in particle distribution is caught before it affects a full week of ration batches.

5

Add ground roughage last in the TMR mixer sequence

Even well-ground roughage can de-mix if added first and then over-mixed with grain. Standard TMR mixing protocol adds dry roughage in the final 3–5 mixer revolutions. This keeps the fibre evenly distributed through the mix without reducing particle length below target through over-mixing shear.

Measuring Sorting: Before and After the Grinder

Metric Long Hay in TMR (unground) 9F-70 Ground Hay (8 mm screen)
% DM on 19 mm sieve 25–45% 2–5%
Sorting index (1.0 = no sorting) 0.6–0.8 0.92–0.98
Refusal composition Straw-heavy, grain depleted Representative of fresh ration
Intake variability across pen High (CV 18–25%) Low (CV 6–10%)
Double-blade mower for high-volume forage cutting

Higher forage volumes require reliable, high-capacity equipment at every stage — from cutting to baling to grinding — to keep feeding programmes on schedule.

EverPower 9F-70: The Anti-Sorting Tool for Australian Feedlots

The 9F-70 Animal Feed Grass Grinder is available from EverPower Baling Machinery Australia. Fitted with a CNC-punched 8 mm screen, it delivers the particle distribution required to bring sorting indices above 0.92 in standard beef and dairy TMR rations. Replacement screens in all four hole sizes, hammer sets, and rotor bearing kits are stocked at the Condell Park NSW warehouse with same-day dispatch on orders received before 2:00 PM AEST. Contact EverPower at +61 2 9708 3322 or [email protected] to discuss screen selection for your specific ration and animal class.

Recommended Product: 9F-70 Animal Feed Grass Grinder

9F-70 Animal Feed Grass Grinder Machine

Eliminate cattle sorting with consistent 4–15 mm particle size from hay, straw, and crop residues. CNC-punched screens in 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, and 10 mm sizes. Through-hardened reversible manganese steel hammers. 500–800 kg/hour throughput on dry hay. Electric (415 V 3-phase) and diesel power options. All wear parts stocked at Condell Park NSW for fast Australia-wide dispatch.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What particle size stops cattle from sorting their TMR?+
Keeping less than 8% of ration dry matter on the 19 mm sieve is the standard benchmark. Below this level, cattle cannot reliably select long particles, and sorting indices approach 1.0. An 8 mm screen on the 9F-70 achieves this for most hay and straw types.
2. How do I know if my cattle are sorting?+
Compare the particle size distribution of the fresh ration with the refusal after 24 hours. If the refusal has significantly more long particles (straw, hay stalks) and less fine material (grain, leaf) than the fresh ration, sorting is occurring. Use a Penn State Particle Separator sieve set to quantify the comparison.
3. Will grinding hay too fine cause problems?+
Yes. Grinding below 4–5 mm reduces rumen mat formation and rumination time, cutting saliva production and increasing acidosis risk. The goal is the narrowest particle range that prevents sorting while still supporting adequate fibre length — the 8 mm screen target of 6–15 mm achieves this balance for most beef and dairy rations.
4. How quickly will I see results after switching to ground roughage?+
Feedbunk behaviour changes are visible within 7–14 days — refusal composition becomes more representative of the fresh ration and pen intake variability decreases. Production outcomes (ADG improvement in beef, milk fat stabilisation in dairy) typically manifest within 21–30 days as the full herd adapts to the more consistent nutrient delivery.
5. Can I get screen and hammer advice from EverPower for my specific ration?+
Yes. Contact EverPower Baling Machinery Australia at +61 2 9708 3322 or [email protected] with your feed material type, animal class, and target particle size, and the team can recommend the correct screen and maintenance schedule for your operation.

Stop Sorting. Start Feeding the Ration You Paid For.

EverPower can advise on screen selection and hammer maintenance for anti-sorting TMR particle size targets on your operation.

Contact EverPower Australia

EverPower Baling Machinery Australia Pty Ltd  |  27 Harley Crescent, Condell Park NSW 2200
📞 +61 2 9708 3322  |  ✉️ [email protected]

TAGs: